Finishing 32 hours of work marathon… and still clocking

Rants June 13th, 2007

When I woke up at 12pm on a Tuesday afternoon, I had a feeling that that was just about as much sleep I would get this week. Work was piling up sky-high and everything that needs my attention is urgent.

Freelancing as a web developer/designer is never an easy thing to do. I give up my sleep hours, burn my weekends, work through the nights and probably sacrificing tonnes of personal time with my loved ones just to make ends meet. Something really isn’t right here. While I may seem like ranting, I think this is something that I asked for; and nope, no one pointed a gun at me - no knives, no kidnaps, no blackmails.

Of course, sometimes I wonder if it is all worth it - spending so much time working just for a mere pittance, and people have been telling me that I should be out there selling insurance policies and houses. “要做就做大的” (if you want to do it, then make it big), my friends would always tell me.

Why should you spend sleepless nights and rushing weekends working for such a small amount of money?

But what most of my friends don’t understand, this is about the best thing I can do with my own hands. I don’t think there’s another job that I can do without time and spatial constraint. Short of selling myself, I really don’t know what else I can do just to make that dollar more.

I guess today is just one of the near breakdown points. 32 hours and counting. I am quite sure I will be breaking the 72 hours record soon. Perhaps even more. :(

Fee hike by Starhub CableTV

Singapore June 12th, 2007

There was a recent brouhaha about the subscription rate hike by Starhub CableTV. The first article reproduced below was the first of what the public heard of the hike:

CABLE television subscribers here will soon have to pay more to watch their favourite programmes, with sports fans the hardest hit. From July 11, StarHub will increase the subscription fees for all its pay-TV packages by $4 a month.

But those who subscribe to the sports package will have to pay an additional $10. The monthly fee now is $15.

The new $25 sports subscription fee is likely to take effect from October.

StarHub cited the rising cost of content, which it has offered regularly at no extra cost, as the reason behind the hike.

Said its senior vice-president of cable, fixed and IP services, Thomas Ee: ‘Most pay-TV operators around the world increase prices periodically, and StarHub has not done so despite a steady rise in costs over the years.

‘It is impossible to continue absorbing the costs indefinitely, so we have no choice but to implement this rate adjustment at this time.’

StarHub says the delay in the price increase for its sports packages would help ease the pain for customers.

‘We decided to introduce the price adjustments one at a time and to bear the increased sports costs ourselves for a few more months,’ said Mr Ee.

This will be the first time since 1995 that StarHub is increasing its basic pay-TV subscription fees.

It translates to a $49 minimum monthly subscription for the basic group plus sports.

In Thailand, TrueVisions charges 1,412.97 baht (S$67) a month for a similar package. Malaysia’s Astro has priced its package at RM54.95 (S$24) a month.

But many subscribers were still unhappy.

Businessman Ong Boon Teck vowed to cancel his subscriptions. He said: ‘How can it be ethical for StarHub to increase the price when a lot of their customers are already under contract?’

Added another businessman, Leslie Yeo, 47: ‘It’s a monopoly where consumers are left with no choice, simply because StarHub is the only cable TV provider.’

Sports fans were among those who had plenty to say about the hike. They had already seen subscription fees for the sports package increase from $8 to $15 a month in October 2004.

Now, they face a $14 increment to get their sports fix.

Mr Ee said that the increase for the sports package was much higher because ‘it would not be fair for non- sports fans to be affected by the escalating sports costs’.

Although no official figures were released, it was estimated that StarHub paid $246 million last November to buy the exclusive rights to screen English Premier League (EPL) soccer matches here for three years.

StarHub won the rights after a bidding war with SingTel and ESPN STARSports (ESS).

The deal gives StarHub exclusive broadcast rights to as many as 380 EPL matches on all three of its platforms - cable TV, mobile and online.

The $246 million is believed to be on the high side. ESS had reportedly forked out £100 million (S$300 million) to broadcast the EPL in more than 20 Asian countries for three seasons, starting from 2004 to 2005.

Businesses like pubs and coffee shops are unlikely to be spared. StarHub said it would announce sports packages for commercial outlets soon.

Currently, commercial outlets pay $400 for the first television set and $200 for every subsequent set.

While the second article gave a glimpse of the backlash that Starhub will get if they were to impose the hikes without consideration of consumers who have just recently renewed their contracts:

THE Consumers’ Association of Singapore (Case) has called for StarHub to allow subscribers to their cable television service to be able to opt out without any penalities following news of the subscription fee hike.

‘If the consumers are not happy with the fee hike, I suppose they have every right to terminate the contract. The only thing we ask is that StarHub will not impose any penalty on them if they decide to do so,’ said Case’s executive director Seah Seng Choon.

Since news of the fee hike was released on Monday, readers have posted their comments online on The Straits Times discussion board.

Some have called for their contracts to be rescinded.

Case has received two complaints from consumers and will be writing to StarHub by tomorrow, urging them to not penalise subscribers who decide to terminate their subscriptions.

It is also asking the Infocomm Development Authority to ‘enlighten’ the public on why they approved the fee hike.

And as a matter of good business practice, Case said StarHub should provide consumers with some differentiation in their products to justify the fee increase.

From July 11, StarHub will increase the subscription fees for all its pay-TV packages by $4 a month.

But those who subscribe to the sports package will have to pay an additional $10. The monthly fee now is $15.

The new $25 sports subscription fee is likely to take effect from October.

Personally, I feel that, as a consumer, I should not be subjected to their whims and fancies where hikes are concerned. Should I have taken up their 32″ LCD TV offer months ago, I would have been locked in for a good 2 years. Any benefits that I could have gotten from their TV would have been effectively zerorized. While there’s just a few more months to the end of my contract, I decided to write them an email to garner what the fate of their contracted customers will be. Reproduced below is their official reply to me:

Dear Miss xxxx

Thank you for your email of 11 June 2007.

We would like to inform you that the price adjustment is applicable for all cable TV subscription. We seek to explain that the price increase for the basic groups is due to the escalating content costs.

If you have any questions on our services, please email to this address or fax in to 6725 1603 (+65 6725 1603 from overseas).

Yours sincerely
xxxx
Customer Affairs

So it does seem like I would be locked into their new fees afterall. As a hubber (subscriber of all 3 services) , I get to enjoy certain amount of discounts. But with the impending fee hike, I might just lose all the discounts that I have been enjoying so far. I don’t know. I don’t have time to do my sums yet. But it does seem like I’d be returning my setup box very soon.

Here’s to Starhub: It’s bad that your offers are consistently targeting new customers and ignoring the current ones. Now that you are going to lock all your customers with the new fee hike, there could jolly well be a backlash. Of course, it would have been calculated risk on your part, but Singaporeans are getting less forgiving nowadays. As for me, I’d be returning my setup box right after the contract expires. :( As for Case, I guess it’s a case (pun unintended) of the bark louder than the bite.

Ed: Here’s how you can terminate your contract / service with Starhub. I am not advocating that you should, but just that I had a few referrers from search engines on this.

My feeble feedback to Nets

Singapore June 8th, 2007

Read in the Straits Times that Nets had published a 10 FAQ and are listening to feedback (as a holistic approach to fees hike). Reproduced below is my feeble protest feedback to Nets with regards to the feed hike: 

Dear Sir,

With regards to the fee hike, there is no doubt that Nets users like myself will end up bearing the bulk of the surcharge, just like what happened at the recent PC Show - where customers are charged an additional 2-3% if we were to pay by credit card. It is pointless for us to write in to complain because they will be everywhere. This is a fact that we will have to face with. The least extreme of passing on the surcharge back to the consumers is the denying of better discounts to Nets-paying customers. Again, this is reflected in everyday shopping of electronics goods. Should we decide to pay by Cash or Nets now, as opposed to credit cards, we may be given better discounts. July will be the time that better discounts will only be given if we pay by cash. Again, I iterate that it is pointless for us to write in to complain because this practice is rampant.

As I am writing this, I am already preparing to get a bigger purse so that I would get used to a cash-based transaction, where I will be given better discounts when I make my purchases. My ATM card is now only useful for withdrawing cash from ATMs, until a point in time when I have to pay a surcharge for withdrawing cash from ATMs, which I am sure will happen one day.

Thank you for listening to my feedback.

Best regards, Simply Jean

Growing up with parents

Reminisces June 8th, 2007

I was about to write on monitors that I have bought and what headaches they gave me. But I have since decided that I should write about something closer to the heart (not that the monitors are not close - they ripped a hole from my pocket!). I shall write about growing up with my parents.

I do not have super-duper memory but I remembered growing up with a lot of care from my parents, with my fair share of punishments should I do anything wrongly. I don’t remember being caned for bad test results, but I always ended up reprimanding myself and turned depressed when I didn’t do well. There was once I was so sad, I cried and cried and apologised to my parents for not doing well. Of course, I didn’t get the toy I wanted, but they gave me a consolation prize nonetheless.

My primary school days were filled with doing assignment books - 1 per day if possible, if not 1 every 2 days. Come to think of it, I enjoyed it a lot because it gave great satisfaction to get correct answers and I get to learn from wrong answers without being penalized (in exams). However, I wasn’t the top student in school as my parents would have expected me to… simply because… I was just hardworking, a mugger, but not a genius. Only real geniuses can excel and be a top student in my school. I was a pseudo-genius. Haha… :P

I also remembered that my mum would write her own assessment books for me to complete - 1 jotter book after another, until a point in time, I was so fed up, I threw the books onto the floor. Needless to say, I got caned upside down and inside out. However, without all those canings, I would probably still be a lazy bum now - bumming my way here and  there.

Life in primary school was filled with rewards and punishments - where results are concerned. My mum would stop short of calling me stupid, but I get punished for careless mistakes committed during exams, and spared for mistakes that are genuine, i.e. “unseen questions”. Rewards would come in the form of toys - things that I wanted or desired if I topped the class, and smaller stuffs if I came in 2nd or 3rd. Anything lesser than that would see me kneeling on durian husks result in prizes that comes in the form of more assessment books for the following year.

Secondary school life and beyond was totally different. My parents left me the way I was because school life was stressful. It was tough and for the first time in my life, I ended up at the bottom of, not just the class, but the entire school; and I tasted failure for an entire duration of 2 years before I finally started picking up. It was tough, but my parents were there to just encourage me, with no more harsh words.

And as they say, the rest are all history. Looking back now, I am quite grateful for my parents’ care. Without all the canings, I am not too sure where I would be now. It was painful, but essential for someone like me.

Protected: See that nuffnang ad?

General June 8th, 2007

This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:


If you have been given a One-Time-Password (OTP) you may enter the password below: