Maybe Singapore should ban this as well…

International December 4th, 2007

Came across this about banning stuffs in Malaysia. Apparently, there’s a scratch and win scam going around, whereby people were approached to scratch and win some stuffs, but in order to collect them, they need to buy more stuffs, usually expensive stuffs.

What I find perplexing is that people actually take loans to find these expensive stuffs just to collect the prizes, which is usually a car. Doesn’t this sound suspiciously like that happens in Singapore? Except that they don’t tell you that you’d won a car - probably something less expensive, but they want you to buy into their timeshare s*ahem*c*cough*a*ah-choo*m…

KUALA LUMPUR - MALAYSIA has banned scratch-and-win contests after thousands of people complained they were duped and did not receive the promised prizes, an official said.

The Domestic Trade and Consumer Affairs Ministry has made it illegal to hold such contests, said ministry Enforcement Deputy Director Iskandar Halim Sulaiman on Tuesday.

In scratch-and-win contests, consumers are given paper cards with an area coated with coloured plastic that can be scratched with a coin to reveal whether a prize has been won.

Mr Iskandar said direct sales staff often duped consumers at supermarkets or at their doorsteps with cards that showed they had won cars or other expensive items. However, to get the prizes, consumers were asked to first buy the company’s products, and in the end ‘never get the car’, Mr Iskandar said.

Almost 1,400 complaints were filed in the first 10 months of this year, with many people claiming they lost thousands of ringgit in the scams, often used by direct marketing companies, Mr Iskandar said.

Companies found illegally conducting such contests risk a fine, up to three years in prison and a loss of their business licenses, he said.

The Star newspaper quoted a 42-year-old civil servant, Ms Satilah Mahmood, as saying she lost RM27,000 (S$12,000) in a scratch-and-win scheme this year.

The home theatre system and massage chair she bought - to be eligible for more prizes - broke down within weeks, the newspaper said. It said the people who lured her with prizes moved out of their rented office.

‘My family is now saddled with debts,’ it quoted her as saying. — AP

Article obtained from straitstimes.com on 4th December 2007

Getting my hair cut… bye bye long hair, hello shortie

Personal December 4th, 2007

Haha… getting my hair cut today. Really short. Maybe it’s a good way to vent emotions. I’ll probably be so heartache about the short hair that it’d overwrite whatever emotions I am harbouring…

Thinking of posting before and after photos… then again, maybe not.

Some humour to fight the Tuesday blues! =P

Humour December 4th, 2007

These are from a book called Disorder in the American Courts, and are things people actually said in court, word for word, taken down and now published by court reporters who had the torment of staying calm while these exchanges were actually taking place.
  ______________________________________
ATTORNEY: Are you sexually active?
WITNESS: No, I just lie there.
  ______________________________________
ATTORNEY: What gear were you in at the moment of the  impact?
WITNESS: Gucci sweats and Reeboks.
   ______________________________________
ATTORNEY: This myasthenia gravis, does it affect your memory at all?
WITNESS: Yes.
ATTORNEY: And in what ways does it affect your memory?
WITNESS: I forget.
ATTORNEY: You forget? Can you give us an example of some thing you forgot?
   _____________________________________
ATTORNEY: What was the first thing your husband said to you that morning?
WITNESS: He said, ‘Where am I, Cathy?’
ATTORNEY: And why did that upset you?
WITNESS: My name is Susan!
   ______________________________________
ATTORNEY: Do you know if your daughter has ever been involved in voodoo?
WITNESS: We both do.
ATTORNEY: Voodoo?
WITNESS: We do.
ATTORNEY: You do?
WITNESS: Yes, voodoo.
  ______________________________________
ATTORNEY: Now doctor, isn’t it true that when a person dies in his sleep, he doesn’t know about it until the next morning?
WITNESS: Did you actually pass the bar exam?
   ____________________________________
ATTORNEY: The youngest son, the twenty-year-old, how old is he?
WITNESS: Uh, he’s twenty-one.
   ________________________________________
ATTORNEY: Were you present when your picture was taken?
WITNESS: Are you shitt’in me?
  ______________________________________
ATTORNEY: So the date of conception (of the baby) was August 8th?
WITNESS: Yes.
ATTORNEY: And what were you doing at that time?
WITNESS: Uh…. I was gett’in laid!
___________________________________
ATTORNEY: She had three children, right?
WITNESS: Yes.
ATTORNEY: How many were boys?
WITNESS: None.
ATTORNEY: Were there any girls?
WITNESS: Are you shitt’in me? Your Honor, I think I need a
different attorney. Can I get a new Attorney?
______________________________________
ATTORNEY: How was your first marriage terminated?
WITNESS: By death.
ATTORNEY: And by whose death was it terminated?
WITNESS: Now whose death do you suppose terminated it?
   ______________________________________
ATTORNEY: Can you describe the individual?
WITNESS: He was about medium height and had a beard.
ATTORNEY: Was this a male or a female?
WITNESS: Guess.
   _____________________________________
ATTORNEY: Is your appearance here this morning pursuant to a deposition notice which I sent to your attorney?
WITNESS: No, this is how I dress when I go to work.
   ______________________________________
ATTORNEY: Doctor, how many of your autopsies have you performed on dead people?
WITNESS: All my autopsies are performed on dead people. Would you like to rephrase that?
   ______________________________________
ATTORNEY: ALL your responses MUST be oral, OK? What school did you go to?
WITNESS: Oral.
   ______________________________________
ATTORNEY: Do you recall the time that you examined the body?
WITNESS: The autopsy started around 8:30 p.m.
ATTORNEY: And Mr. Denton was dead at the time?
WITNESS: No, he was sitting on the table wondering why I was doing an autopsy on him!
   ____________________________________________
ATTORNEY: Are you qualified to give a urine sample?
WITNESS: Huh….are you qualified to ask that question?
   ______________________________________
And the best for last:
ATTORNEY: Doctor, before you performed the autopsy, did you check for a pulse?
WITNESS: No.
ATTORNEY: Did you check for blood pressure?
WITNESS: No.
ATTORNEY: Did you check for breathing?
WITNESS: No.
ATTORNEY: So, then it is possible that the patient was alive when you began the autopsy?
WITNESS: No.
ATTORNEY: How can you be so sure, Doctor?
WITNESS: Because his brain was sitting on my desk in a jar.
ATTORNEY: I see, but could the patient have still been alive,
nevertheless?
WITNESS: Yes, it is possible that he could have been alive and practicing law.

Going up: Taxi fares!

Singapore December 4th, 2007

So, it’s confirmed. Taxi fares are set to raise to a flag-down rate of S$2.80, up 30 cents from S$2.50.  I think it’s rather silly - the way that things are handled. It was reported that the taxi drivers wanted it, their associations asked for it, so all that’s left is for the companies to do it, however, the forgot that while the companies can raise the flag-down rates, they can conveniently raise the daily rental from the drivers.

I find it kind of amusing. The passengers are baring the brunt of the entire thing, while the taxi companies are happily smiling all the way to the banks. In the eyes of the drivers, the companies are the good guys while the passengers are the bad ones. After all, who are the ones who allow them to make a living? The companies; and who are the ones that complains about the? The passengers.

So?

So, the passengers should be punished - but of course, this is a deviation from their motive. Their (the drivers) real motive is just to make a decent living - after all, shouldn’t the passengers bare the brunt of EVERY that raises? The taxi driver’s income should not be affected!

Haha… damn. Why doesn’t my stipend go up with the cost of living? Sometimes, looking at how they argue really makes my toes laugh. No, I am really empathise with them, but don’t they realise that the real person who is making all the money at the end of the day is the man behind the taxi company?

Seriously, this makes my day. I’m going to be so much happier taking the bus now.

More on this later. Gonna be late and no cabs for me.

TAXI drivers want it and their associations have asked for it, so all that remains is for the biggest taxi operator ComfortDelGro to go ahead and do it - raise taxi fares that is.

All the signs point to it happening, and soon. A year after the last increase, which saw the flag-down rate go up by 10 cents to at least $2.50 and peak period surcharge double to $2, sources say a bigger jump is imminent.

The flag-down fare is expected to rise by 30 cents, bringing the minimum starting fare to $2.80.

Newer taxis such as the Hyundai Sonata and Kia Magentis charge 20 cents more, so their flag-down rate should hit $3, The Straits Times understands.

Distance and time-based rates are also expected to change. Currently, the meter advances by 10 cents every 210m or every 25 seconds of waiting. After 10km, it jumps 10 cents every 175m.

Industry observers expect leading operator ComfortDelGro to make the first move this month, but the company has remained mum about its plans.

‘Fare adjustment is a commercially sensitive topic, so we cannot comment on it,’ ComfortDelGro spokesman Tammy Tan said.

For the past three weeks or so, the company - which has a fleet of 15,000 taxis - has been sending its cabs to have their meters adjusted.

Ms Tan said this was mainly to update the meters for next year’s public holiday slots. There is a $1 surcharge for public holidays.

But The Straits Times understands the tweaks - taking around 20 minutes per cab - also include adding a chip to allow the metered fare structure to be adjusted wirelessly.

Taxi drivers have been calling for a fare hike for several weeks now, citing the higher cost of fuel and the two percentage point rise in the goods and services tax, which has raised their rental rate by an average of $50 a month.

Diesel at the pumps, after a discount, has risen by around 20 per cent since the last cab fare increase in July last year, raising fuel cost per cab by around $300 each month.

Member of Parliament Seng Han Thong, an adviser to the taxi operators’ associations, said taxi fares should be pegged to the cost cabbies bear. He told The Straits Times two weeks ago that the taxi operators’ associations have been lobbying for a fare rise.

‘Although taxi drivers are always worried about losing business if fares go up too high…they still hope there would be a fare increase,’ Mr Seng said.

Some quarters have called for fares to rise substantially to manage demand, so that commuters who need a cab will find it easier to get one.

Cabby Chew Lian Sheng, 37, said that is the ‘only way to manage demand’, since taxi companies are unable to put more taxis on the road because there are not enough drivers around.

Mr Chew said the flag-down fare should be between $7 and $10. ‘There’d be a public outcry. But cabbies can earn a living with fewer trips.’

Mr Chew is also of the view that surcharges must be removed or at least, simplified, as they ‘create an artificial market’.

Cabby Manjeet Singh, 62, said the flag-down fare should be $6 or $7. ‘It’s pathetic now,’ he said. ‘We should also abolish the surcharges - they are very confusing.’

Transport researcher and National University of Singapore lecturer Lee Der-Horng said simply raising fares would not solve all taxi woes. He said a ‘package solution’ was needed.

This includes having Electronic Road Pricing subsidies to encourage cabbies to go into the Central Business District; more designated taxi stands in the city centre; and simplifying surcharges.

Associate Professor Lee also suggested having ‘a centralised call booking system…This way, passengers will just need to dial one number to get access to the pool of taxis from all taxi companies’,

He said doing away with all surcharges may not be the answer. For instance, how can cabbies be encouraged to ply the ‘graveyard shift’ otherwise?

Nevertheless, he reckons the imbalance between demand and supply ‘cannot be fully resolved’.

christan@sph.com.sg

tracysua@sph.com.sg

Article obtained from straitstimes.com on 3rd December 2007