It seemed like Apple wanted a share of the apple (revenue) pie in Singapore from the telcos who are selling their phones – something which the local telcos have not been giving in to. Agreement to this may open a can of worms where other manufacturers such as Nokia, Sony Ericsson, Samsung or LG might start asking for the same treatment. However, it is known that iPhones are locked to the telcos which Apple had partnered with and may be unlocked illegally, effectively voiding any warranty and attracting possible litigation to the owner, hacker or both.

This effectively means that the Singapore version of iPhone will take longer to come – which may result in either a rise in demand for locked iPhones or a wane of interest of it. Either way, I hope Nokia will come up with something nice (a touch phone?) with a longer battery life – though I am not sure if this is an oxymoron. =P

SINGAPORE consumers who want to get their hands on Apple’s iPhone, hailed as Time Magazine’s gadget of the year for 2007, will have to wait.

The reason: None of the three mobile phone operators here has been able to lock down a deal with the California-based tech giant.

In all the markets that Apple has launched the iPhone in, the device has been sold through a single operator, with whom Apple shares revenue.

Market observers say that local operators may be baulking at Apple’s reported insistence on such a tie-up, and the company is unlikely to make an exemption to its money-spinning model for such a small market.

Officially, the three operators would only say that discussions are ongoing.

Over four million iPhones have been sold worldwide since it was launched last June.

In addition to its cellular phone capability, the gadget also boasts a full touch-screen interface and can play music and video.

Many hankering to get their hands on it have bought it while overseas. Some retailers here have also taken to parallel importing of sets.

The software on these grey-market sets has to be ‘hacked’ to allow them to work with the SIM cards issued by local operators. Apple has since threatened these parallel importers with legal action to get them to stop importing iPhones, but The Straits Times understands that some are still selling them.

Arguably, hacking the iPhone’s software constitutes copyright infringement in much the same way modifying a PlayStation game console to play pirated games is, although it is untested in court. Rights owners have never gone after end-users doing this here.

Apple enforces its one-mobile-operator-per-market policy by ‘locking’ the iPhone so that only the designated operator’s SIM card can be used. This means customers must sign up with that operator.

In return, Apple reportedly requires that its operator partner give it a 10 to 30 per cent share of the revenue from iPhone sales.

But Singapore’s Infocomm Development Authority has outlawed SIM-card locking, to allow consumers to switch operators freely. This, however, also means any operator here will not enjoy the full benefit of a deal with Apple.

France also prohibits SIM-card locking. Apple’s operator partner there, Orange, sells two iPhone versions – a locked one for 399 euros (S$844) and an unlocked one for 749 euros.

The issue has also surfaced in Germany, where the courts allowed Apple’s partner T-Mobile to keep selling locked iPhones despite complaints from T-Mobile’s rivals.

Operators here are likely to say no to the unprecedented demand for a cut of their revenues.

An executive with one telco said any deal to share revenue with Apple would ‘open up a can of worms’.

Give in to Apple, the executive said, and other big phone makers like Nokia and Sony-Ericsson may start asking for similar arrangements.

Just this week, China’s biggest mobile operator, China Mobile, rejected Apple’s offer to be its exclusive iPhone distributor in the world’s biggest mobile market because Apple wanted a 30 per cent cut of its revenues from iPhone sales.

Another factor that depresses chances of a deal: The longer negotiations take, the less desirable the iPhone becomes, said Cazenove telecommunications analyst Lai Voon San.

‘Those who really want and can afford a premium product like the iPhone probably already have it,’ he said.

Apple did not reply by press time.

Article obtained from on 17th January 2008

Leave a Comment

%d bloggers like this: