Oh, is Singapore growing smaller? No… it is… the size of studio apartment is growing smaller. The new Kent Residences in Kent Road is building studio that squeeze a kitchen, a bathroom, a bed room and a bay window into 312 sqft. So, how large or rather how small is 312 sqft? Imagine a squash court, divide it into 2, that is roughly the size. An empty half court feels large. But now, put in a kitchen with microwave oven, stove, sink, fridge, washing machine and maybe a dryer since there is no drying yard, and some shelves for the kitchen ware. In addition, add a bathroom, a bedroom and a wardrobe. Ops. What about the dinner area, the living room and study area? Where are they? Hmm…

A TINY studio under construction near Farrer Park may well be the smallest private apartment to be built in Singapore.

It squeezes a bay window, a teeny kitchenette, a bathroom and space for a bed into just 312 sq ft – about half the size of a squash court.

The unit – part of the new Kent Residences in Kent Road – is the most extreme example of an emerging trend in private housing: compact, capsule condos within the city.

Targeted at young singles and property investors, some new studios have shrunk in size to as little as 300 to 400 sq ft, as developers try to make their homes more affordable amid rising costs.

At least 20 new projects launched within the past year have had units smaller than 500 sq ft, which was almost unheard of before last year.

Half of these projects went even further, cutting their smallest units to under 400 sq ft, making them on a par with those in famously space-squeezed cities such as New York and Hong Kong.

Shoebox-sized studios are not entirely new here. A few older condos like Mountbatten Lodge have units less than 400 sq ft in size.

What’s new is the recent proliferation of such projects, especially in Farrer Park, Balestier and Dhoby Ghaut. Most are built by boutique developers and have under 100 units.

Thanks to the property boom last year, home prices in these areas start at just below $1,000 per sq ft (psf) and go up to $1,600 psf. For a 400 sq ft condo, this translates to well below $700,000.

‘Construction costs are going up and space is becoming very expensive, so developers have to offer something that is affordable for the majority of home-buyers,’ said Ms Peggy Ngiam, project director of Huttons Real Estate Group.

Her firm has marketed several projects with unusually small units, including Thomson V Two in Upper Thomson Road, where half the 74 units were under 500 sq ft, with the smallest just 355 sq ft.

With a typical unit priced at a mere $377,000, the project sold out within a day.

In fact, most of these boutique projects are fully sold, and the most recent launches have seen good take-up rates.

Ms Ngiam said buyers are a mix of locals and foreigners. Some are single professionals while others are investors looking for good rental yields.

At Citigate in Rangoon Road, which was launched on Monday, 22 of its 32 units were sold within a day. The smallest unit, a 441 sq ft studio, is expected to fetch rentals of $3,000 to $3,500 a month, she said.

Small units also reflect growing demand from singles who want to live in the city on a tight budget, said DTZ Debenham Tie Leung senior research director Chua Chor Hoon. She said developers focused on building large apartments last year and may now see a shortage of small ones.

But other experts warned that buyers may not realise how small these units really are.

‘In the last market run-up in 1996, when prices got higher and higher, the units got smaller and smaller,’ said Mr Colin Tan, head of research and consultancy at Colliers International. Even then, those units were rarely under 500 sq ft, and came without today’s bay windows and air-con ledges, which eat into liveable space, he added.

While most projects offer showflats, the smallest units are often sold on the basis of their floor plans. At Kent Residences, which has just 13 units, buyers were shown only a model of the project and its floor plans.

‘In most cases, when people see the finished flat they have bought off the plan, they say it’s smaller than they expected. Can you imagine what that would be like for a 300 sq ft unit?’ said Mr Tan.

fiochan@sph.com.sg

Article obtained from straitstimes.com on 4th June 2008



Reader's Comments

  1. Zhanzhao | June 5th, 2008 at 12:03 pm

    1/2 the size of a squash court… that sounds like its even smaller than the small hovel Bruce Willis lived in in 5th element…. no wait, that room was even bigger, and had concealable the beds and kitchen stuff in the walls/ceilings…..

    I’d rather just live in the suburbs with lots of room to spare….

  2. xizor2000 | June 5th, 2008 at 8:07 pm

    312sq ft is about 35sq m. Imagine a room that’s 5m x 7m (or 10m x 3.5m). 10m is the distance NS man runs in the 4×10 shuttle run, and 3.5m would barely fit 2 men 1.8m tall with arms outstretched.

    But the question is not how much it will cost you to buy, but how much it will cost them to build. Then try and figure how they pull a figure out of the blue to justify it, and then claim you are subsidised and they are making a loss.

  3. xizor2000 | June 5th, 2008 at 8:09 pm

    Sorry.. it’s barely 29 sq. m. My original estimate was based on 1m = approx. 3ft. I apologise for that mistake!

  4. ambien | January 25th, 2014 at 7:18 pm

    where can i buy zolpidem, where can i buy zolpidem online

Leave a Comment

%d bloggers like this: