<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ren Ci probe: 4 persons charged &#8211; 3 relating to financial affairs, 1 for possession for *ahem* films</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.simplyjean.com/2008/07/16/ren-ci-probe-4-persons-charged-3-relating-to-financial-affairs-1-for-possession-for-ahem-films/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.simplyjean.com/2008/07/16/ren-ci-probe-4-persons-charged-3-relating-to-financial-affairs-1-for-possession-for-ahem-films/</link>
	<description>A peek into the road less travelled...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 15:35:49 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Questions for Joi Ito</title>
		<link>http://blog.simplyjean.com/2008/07/16/ren-ci-probe-4-persons-charged-3-relating-to-financial-affairs-1-for-possession-for-ahem-films/comment-page-1/#comment-22359</link>
		<dc:creator>Questions for Joi Ito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 17:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.simplyjean.com/2008/07/16/ren-ci-probe-4-persons-charged-3-relating-to-financial-affairs-1-for-possession-for-ahem-films/#comment-22359</guid>
		<description>[...] 2: Unless of course the charity in question is Ren Ci, or NKF, or the others that have yet to blow up in the faces of our [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2: Unless of course the charity in question is Ren Ci, or NKF, or the others that have yet to blow up in the faces of our [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JTAN</title>
		<link>http://blog.simplyjean.com/2008/07/16/ren-ci-probe-4-persons-charged-3-relating-to-financial-affairs-1-for-possession-for-ahem-films/comment-page-1/#comment-20360</link>
		<dc:creator>JTAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 17:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.simplyjean.com/2008/07/16/ren-ci-probe-4-persons-charged-3-relating-to-financial-affairs-1-for-possession-for-ahem-films/#comment-20360</guid>
		<description>There is a serious declension of moral values in the charity and religious organisations in Singapore. Charity and religious leaders are getting very materialistic nowadays. If it happens to the former charity chief TT Durai, now Monk Ming Yi of Ren Ci, and etc, it could be anybody anywhere. What about the lucrative pays of the mega church pastors in Singapore? Will the authority investigate into the large charity and religious organisations, as temptation of conspiracy, criminal breach of trust and etc., in these areas is the strongest?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a serious declension of moral values in the charity and religious organisations in Singapore. Charity and religious leaders are getting very materialistic nowadays. If it happens to the former charity chief TT Durai, now Monk Ming Yi of Ren Ci, and etc, it could be anybody anywhere. What about the lucrative pays of the mega church pastors in Singapore? Will the authority investigate into the large charity and religious organisations, as temptation of conspiracy, criminal breach of trust and etc., in these areas is the strongest?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JTAN</title>
		<link>http://blog.simplyjean.com/2008/07/16/ren-ci-probe-4-persons-charged-3-relating-to-financial-affairs-1-for-possession-for-ahem-films/comment-page-1/#comment-20359</link>
		<dc:creator>JTAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 17:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.simplyjean.com/2008/07/16/ren-ci-probe-4-persons-charged-3-relating-to-financial-affairs-1-for-possession-for-ahem-films/#comment-20359</guid>
		<description>I am very pleased that there is true justice against pilferage, criminal breach of trust, and conspiracy in our country, even among religious leaders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am very pleased that there is true justice against pilferage, criminal breach of trust, and conspiracy in our country, even among religious leaders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Singapore Daily &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Weekly Roundup: Week 29</title>
		<link>http://blog.simplyjean.com/2008/07/16/ren-ci-probe-4-persons-charged-3-relating-to-financial-affairs-1-for-possession-for-ahem-films/comment-page-1/#comment-20139</link>
		<dc:creator>The Singapore Daily &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Weekly Roundup: Week 29</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 04:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.simplyjean.com/2008/07/16/ren-ci-probe-4-persons-charged-3-relating-to-financial-affairs-1-for-possession-for-ahem-films/#comment-20139</guid>
		<description>[...] Ren Ci Monk Scam? - Simply Gab: … there will be others (response to Andrew) - Simply Jean: Ren Ci probe: 4 persons charged - 3 relating to financial affairs, 1 for possession for *ahem* films - To Fix a Mocking Peasant: Charged for Possessing Uncertified Films? - Feed Me To The Fish: Has [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ren Ci Monk Scam? &#8211; Simply Gab: … there will be others (response to Andrew) &#8211; Simply Jean: Ren Ci probe: 4 persons charged &#8211; 3 relating to financial affairs, 1 for possession for *ahem* films &#8211; To Fix a Mocking Peasant: Charged for Possessing Uncertified Films? &#8211; Feed Me To The Fish: Has [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neo</title>
		<link>http://blog.simplyjean.com/2008/07/16/ren-ci-probe-4-persons-charged-3-relating-to-financial-affairs-1-for-possession-for-ahem-films/comment-page-1/#comment-19976</link>
		<dc:creator>Neo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 17:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.simplyjean.com/2008/07/16/ren-ci-probe-4-persons-charged-3-relating-to-financial-affairs-1-for-possession-for-ahem-films/#comment-19976</guid>
		<description>It seems like government&#039;s initiatives of promoting entrepreneurship has taken place! Even monk knows how to   run an entity like a company CEO. Like Jwong said, way  to go, monk!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like government&#8217;s initiatives of promoting entrepreneurship has taken place! Even monk knows how to   run an entity like a company CEO. Like Jwong said, way  to go, monk!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wealth Journey</title>
		<link>http://blog.simplyjean.com/2008/07/16/ren-ci-probe-4-persons-charged-3-relating-to-financial-affairs-1-for-possession-for-ahem-films/comment-page-1/#comment-19939</link>
		<dc:creator>Wealth Journey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 08:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.simplyjean.com/2008/07/16/ren-ci-probe-4-persons-charged-3-relating-to-financial-affairs-1-for-possession-for-ahem-films/#comment-19939</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s good that this purging is happening. It will move the charity system to a more robust corporate governance. 

However, I would expect more details on what the role of the committee is, why this was not detected internally and how they could have let this gone thru. 

It seems this is a common occurrence thus far. You have a board committee that seems to be instituted because there is a need for it, so you go thru&#039; the formality. But this really raises my curiousity on whether the members of the board know what their role is and how to execute that. 

To me, this is a failure of the board committee as much as the monk that this was allowed to happen. 

http://wealthjourney.wordpress.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s good that this purging is happening. It will move the charity system to a more robust corporate governance. </p>
<p>However, I would expect more details on what the role of the committee is, why this was not detected internally and how they could have let this gone thru. </p>
<p>It seems this is a common occurrence thus far. You have a board committee that seems to be instituted because there is a need for it, so you go thru&#8217; the formality. But this really raises my curiousity on whether the members of the board know what their role is and how to execute that. </p>
<p>To me, this is a failure of the board committee as much as the monk that this was allowed to happen. </p>
<p><a href="http://wealthjourney.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/wealthjourney.wordpress.com');">http://wealthjourney.wordpress.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rockeye</title>
		<link>http://blog.simplyjean.com/2008/07/16/ren-ci-probe-4-persons-charged-3-relating-to-financial-affairs-1-for-possession-for-ahem-films/comment-page-1/#comment-19912</link>
		<dc:creator>Rockeye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 03:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.simplyjean.com/2008/07/16/ren-ci-probe-4-persons-charged-3-relating-to-financial-affairs-1-for-possession-for-ahem-films/#comment-19912</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not surprise because charity work in Singapore has become a commerical entity under the guidance and close supervision from PAP. 

Money always not enough and the more the merrier!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not surprise because charity work in Singapore has become a commerical entity under the guidance and close supervision from PAP. </p>
<p>Money always not enough and the more the merrier!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Singapore Daily &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Daily Sg: 17 Jul 2008</title>
		<link>http://blog.simplyjean.com/2008/07/16/ren-ci-probe-4-persons-charged-3-relating-to-financial-affairs-1-for-possession-for-ahem-films/comment-page-1/#comment-19910</link>
		<dc:creator>The Singapore Daily &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Daily Sg: 17 Jul 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 03:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.simplyjean.com/2008/07/16/ren-ci-probe-4-persons-charged-3-relating-to-financial-affairs-1-for-possession-for-ahem-films/#comment-19910</guid>
		<description>[...] More Clarity! - Simply Gab: &#8230; there will be others (response to Andrew) - Simply Jean: Ren Ci probe: 4 persons charged - 3 relating to financial affairs, 1 for possession for *ahem* films - To Fix a Mocking Peasant: Charged for Possessing Uncertified [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More Clarity! &#8211; Simply Gab: &#8230; there will be others (response to Andrew) &#8211; Simply Jean: Ren Ci probe: 4 persons charged &#8211; 3 relating to financial affairs, 1 for possession for *ahem* films &#8211; To Fix a Mocking Peasant: Charged for Possessing Uncertified [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jwong</title>
		<link>http://blog.simplyjean.com/2008/07/16/ren-ci-probe-4-persons-charged-3-relating-to-financial-affairs-1-for-possession-for-ahem-films/comment-page-1/#comment-19904</link>
		<dc:creator>Jwong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 02:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.simplyjean.com/2008/07/16/ren-ci-probe-4-persons-charged-3-relating-to-financial-affairs-1-for-possession-for-ahem-films/#comment-19904</guid>
		<description>Way to go, monk! Hahahah.
But seriously, a monk with a $2million condo?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Way to go, monk! Hahahah.<br />
But seriously, a monk with a $2million condo?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
